Skip to main content

Head-to-head

Cadillac Optiq vs Audi Q4 e-tron

The Cadillac Optiq starts $4,900 (6%) below the Audi Q4 e-tron. Here's how that price gap plays out across range, charging, safety and warranty.

Key differences at a glance

The biggest material gaps between the Cadillac Optiq and Audi Q4 e-tron, ranked by how much they're likely to matter day-to-day.

  1. 1

    Range · advantage Audi Q4 e-tron

    The Audi Q4 e-tron goes 60 km further on a charge (540 vs 480 km WLTP).

  2. 2

    Price · advantage Cadillac Optiq

    The Cadillac Optiq undercuts the Audi Q4 e-tron by $4,900 (6%) on starting price.

  3. 3

    0–100 km/h · advantage Cadillac Optiq

    The Cadillac Optiq is 0.8 s quicker to 100 km/h (5.9 s vs 6.7 s).

Spec for spec

Highlighted cells show the better number in each row.

Spec
Cadillac Optiq
Audi Q4 e-tron
Price from
$80,000
$84,900
Range (WLTP)
480 km
540 km
Battery capacity
85 kWh
82 kWh
Motor power
224 kW
210 kW
Torque
480 Nm
545 Nm
0–100 km/h
5.9 s
6.7 s
Efficiency
DC fast charging
150 kW
135 kW
Boot
520 L
ANCAP
5★
Vehicle warranty
5 yrs
5 yrs

Where the Cadillac Optiq wins

  • Cheaper by $4,900
  • Quicker 0–100 km/h (5.9s vs 6.7s)
  • Faster DC charging peak (150 kW vs 135 kW)

Where the Audi Q4 e-tron wins

  • 60 km longer WLTP range

Cadillac Optiq

What we like

  • Cadillac luxury cabin at a more accessible price
  • Sub-6-second 0-100
  • Direct-to-consumer sales model

What we don't

  • Cadillac service network limited in Australia
  • Not yet ANCAP rated
  • Pricing not yet finalised for AU

Audi Q4 e-tron

What we like

  • Strong 540 km WLTP range from the 82 kWh battery
  • Premium Audi cabin materials and finish
  • 5-star ANCAP rating

What we don't

  • Premium over the mechanically related VW ID.4
  • DC charging peak (135 kW) trails newer rivals
  • Audi-tax escalates quickly with options

Frequently asked: Cadillac Optiq vs Audi Q4 e-tron

Quick answers to the questions cross-shoppers most often ask about this pair.

Which is cheaper, the Cadillac Optiq or the Audi Q4 e-tron?
The Cadillac Optiq is the cheaper of the two — it starts at $80,000 versus $84,900 for the Audi Q4 e-tron, a $4,900 difference. Prices shown are manufacturer recommended retail excluding on-road costs.
Which has the longer driving range?
The Audi Q4 e-tron has the longer WLTP-claimed range at 540 km, 60 km further than the Cadillac Optiq's 480 km. Real-world range typically lands 10–20% below the WLTP figure depending on speed, terrain, climate and load.
Which one charges faster on a DC fast charger?
The Cadillac Optiq accepts a peak DC charging rate of 150 kW versus 135 kW for the Audi Q4 e-tron. Peak rate only holds for a short window during the charging curve, so real-world 10–80% times often diverge less than the peak numbers suggest. Compatibility with 350 kW chargers depends on the vehicle's onboard architecture, not just the published peak.
Which is quicker off the line?
The Cadillac Optiq does 0–100 km/h in 5.9 seconds — 0.8 s quicker than the Audi Q4 e-tron's 6.7 s. EV acceleration figures hold up at speed better than equivalent petrol cars because electric motors deliver peak torque instantly.
Is the Cadillac Optiq better value than the Audi Q4 e-tron?
On paper the Cadillac Optiq is $4,900 cheaper AND beats the Audi Q4 e-tron on most of the headline specs we measure — meaning by spec-sheet logic it's the stronger value play. What a spec sheet can't capture: brand prestige, dealer network depth, build feel, software polish, and likely resale.

Which one should you buy?

The short version, based on where each car pulls ahead.

Choose the

Cadillac Optiq

if…

  • you want to save $4,900 on the sticker
  • you match the profile: cadillac brand fans
See the Cadillac Optiq →

Choose the

Audi Q4 e-tron

if…

  • maximum range matters (60 km further per charge)
  • you match the profile: premium suv buyers
See the Audi Q4 e-tron →

Verdict reasoning is derived from published specs; brand preference, dealer experience and how a car drives are personal — always take a test drive before deciding.