Skip to main content

Head-to-head

BMW iX3 vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

Just $1,100 separates the BMW iX3 and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N on starting price, but the BMW iX3 goes 357 km further on a charge. Here's where the rest of the spec sheets pull apart.

Key differences at a glance

The biggest material gaps between the BMW iX3 and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, ranked by how much they're likely to matter day-to-day.

  1. 1

    Range · advantage BMW iX3

    The BMW iX3 goes 357 km further on a charge (805 vs 448 km WLTP).

  2. 2

    DC charging · advantage BMW iX3

    The BMW iX3 accepts 167 kW more DC peak charging (400 vs 233 kW), meaning shorter road-trip stops.

  3. 3

    Battery · advantage BMW iX3

    The BMW iX3 carries a 24.7 kWh larger battery (108.7 vs 84 kWh).

  4. 4

    Power · advantage Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

    The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N puts down 133 kW more (478 vs 345 kW).

  5. 5

    0–100 km/h · advantage Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

    The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is 1.5 s quicker to 100 km/h (3.4 s vs 4.9 s).

Spec for spec

Highlighted cells show the better number in each row.

Spec
BMW iX3
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Price from
$109,900
$111,000
Range (WLTP)
805 km
448 km
Battery capacity
108.7 kWh
84 kWh
Motor power
345 kW
478 kW
Torque
645 Nm
770 Nm
0–100 km/h
4.9 s
3.4 s
Efficiency
DC fast charging
400 kW
233 kW
Boot
520 L
480 L
ANCAP
5★
Vehicle warranty
5 yrs
5 yrs

Where the BMW iX3 wins

  • Cheaper by $1,100
  • 357 km longer WLTP range
  • Faster DC charging peak (400 kW vs 233 kW)

Where the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N wins

  • Quicker 0–100 km/h (3.4s vs 4.9s)

BMW iX3

What we like

  • Class-leading 805 km WLTP range
  • 400 kW DC charging is the highest figure in the segment
  • Fresh Neue Klasse platform

What we don't

  • ANCAP rating not yet established (testing due mid-2026)
  • Pricing is a step above the older iX3
  • Top numbers come from the larger battery variant

Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

What we like

  • Sub-3.5s 0-100 km/h
  • Bespoke N performance hardware and chassis tuning
  • Same 800V E-GMP fast-charging architecture

What we don't

  • Premium over standard Ioniq 5 is substantial
  • Simulated engine sounds polarise EV purists
  • Range drops vs standard Ioniq 5

Frequently asked: BMW iX3 vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

Quick answers to the questions cross-shoppers most often ask about this pair.

Which is cheaper, the BMW iX3 or the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N?
The BMW iX3 is the cheaper of the two — it starts at $109,900 versus $111,000 for the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, a $1,100 difference. Prices shown are manufacturer recommended retail excluding on-road costs.
Which has the longer driving range?
The BMW iX3 has the longer WLTP-claimed range at 805 km, 357 km further than the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N's 448 km. Real-world range typically lands 10–20% below the WLTP figure depending on speed, terrain, climate and load.
Which one charges faster on a DC fast charger?
The BMW iX3 accepts a peak DC charging rate of 400 kW versus 233 kW for the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. Peak rate only holds for a short window during the charging curve, so real-world 10–80% times often diverge less than the peak numbers suggest. Compatibility with 350 kW chargers depends on the vehicle's onboard architecture, not just the published peak.
Which is quicker off the line?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N does 0–100 km/h in 3.4 seconds — 1.5 s quicker than the BMW iX3's 4.9 s. EV acceleration figures hold up at speed better than equivalent petrol cars because electric motors deliver peak torque instantly.

Which one should you buy?

The short version, based on where each car pulls ahead.

Choose the

BMW iX3

if…

  • maximum range matters (357 km further per charge)
  • you regularly do long road trips (faster DC peak)
  • you match the profile: long-distance drivers
See the BMW iX3 →

Choose the

Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

if…

  • you want quicker acceleration off the line
  • you match the profile: performance ev buyers
See the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N →

Verdict reasoning is derived from published specs; brand preference, dealer experience and how a car drives are personal — always take a test drive before deciding.