Skip to main content

Head-to-head

Polestar 3 vs Cadillac Vistiq

Just $2,420 separates the Polestar 3 and Cadillac Vistiq on starting price, but the Polestar 3 goes 155 km further on a charge. Here's where the rest of the spec sheets pull apart.

Key differences at a glance

The biggest material gaps between the Polestar 3 and Cadillac Vistiq, ranked by how much they're likely to matter day-to-day.

  1. 1

    Range · advantage Polestar 3

    The Polestar 3 goes 155 km further on a charge (635 vs 480 km WLTP).

  2. 2

    DC charging · advantage Polestar 3

    The Polestar 3 accepts 160 kW more DC peak charging (350 vs 190 kW), meaning shorter road-trip stops.

  3. 3

    Power · advantage Cadillac Vistiq

    The Cadillac Vistiq puts down 80 kW more (460 vs 380 kW).

  4. 4

    0–100 km/h · advantage Cadillac Vistiq

    The Cadillac Vistiq is 1.0 s quicker to 100 km/h (3.7 s vs 4.7 s).

  5. 5

    Price · advantage Cadillac Vistiq

    The Cadillac Vistiq undercuts the Polestar 3 by $2,420 (2%) on starting price.

Spec for spec

Highlighted cells show the better number in each row.

Spec
Polestar 3
Cadillac Vistiq
Price from
$118,420
$116,000
Range (WLTP)
635 km
480 km
Battery capacity
106 kWh
102 kWh
Motor power
380 kW
460 kW
Torque
910 Nm
894 Nm
0–100 km/h
4.7 s
3.7 s
Efficiency
DC fast charging
350 kW
190 kW
Boot
405 L
ANCAP
5★
Vehicle warranty
5 yrs
5 yrs

Where the Polestar 3 wins

  • 155 km longer WLTP range
  • Faster DC charging peak (350 kW vs 190 kW)

Where the Cadillac Vistiq wins

  • Cheaper by $2,420
  • Quicker 0–100 km/h (3.7s vs 4.7s)

Polestar 3

What we like

  • Class-leading 350 kW DC charging on 2026 spec
  • Spacious cabin with Volvo-derived safety credentials
  • Genuine 635 km WLTP range

What we don't

  • Premium pricing limits cross-shop pool
  • Boot smaller than rivals at this price
  • Polestar service network thinner than Volvo's

Cadillac Vistiq

What we like

  • True 3-row luxury electric SUV
  • Genuine 3.7s 0-100
  • Large 102 kWh battery

What we don't

  • Heavy kerb weight
  • Cadillac service network limited in Australia
  • Modest 480 km WLTP for the battery size

Frequently asked: Polestar 3 vs Cadillac Vistiq

Quick answers to the questions cross-shoppers most often ask about this pair.

Which is cheaper, the Polestar 3 or the Cadillac Vistiq?
The Cadillac Vistiq is the cheaper of the two — it starts at $116,000 versus $118,420 for the Polestar 3, a $2,420 difference. Prices shown are manufacturer recommended retail excluding on-road costs.
Which has the longer driving range?
The Polestar 3 has the longer WLTP-claimed range at 635 km, 155 km further than the Cadillac Vistiq's 480 km. Real-world range typically lands 10–20% below the WLTP figure depending on speed, terrain, climate and load.
Which one charges faster on a DC fast charger?
The Polestar 3 accepts a peak DC charging rate of 350 kW versus 190 kW for the Cadillac Vistiq. Peak rate only holds for a short window during the charging curve, so real-world 10–80% times often diverge less than the peak numbers suggest. Compatibility with 350 kW chargers depends on the vehicle's onboard architecture, not just the published peak.
Which is quicker off the line?
The Cadillac Vistiq does 0–100 km/h in 3.7 seconds — 1.0 s quicker than the Polestar 3's 4.7 s. EV acceleration figures hold up at speed better than equivalent petrol cars because electric motors deliver peak torque instantly.

Which one should you buy?

The short version, based on where each car pulls ahead.

Choose the

Polestar 3

if…

  • maximum range matters (155 km further per charge)
  • you regularly do long road trips (faster DC peak)
  • you match the profile: premium suv buyers
See the Polestar 3 →

Choose the

Cadillac Vistiq

if…

  • you want to save $2,420 on the sticker
  • you want quicker acceleration off the line
  • you match the profile: large families
See the Cadillac Vistiq →

Verdict reasoning is derived from published specs; brand preference, dealer experience and how a car drives are personal — always take a test drive before deciding.