Head-to-head
Polestar 2 vs Mazda 6e
At $49,990 the Mazda 6e undercuts the Polestar 2 by $12,410 (20%) — but does the premium deliver enough of an edge to justify itself? Here's how the two compare on price, range, charging, safety and warranty.

Option A · Sedan
Polestar 2
Sister brand to Volvo, Polestar leans into Scandinavian minimalism. The MY24+ Polestar 2 switched from front-wheel drive to rear-wheel drive, transforming its handling character.
- From
- $62,400
- Range
- 655 km
- Battery
- 82 kWh

Option B · Sedan
Mazda 6e
Mazda's first dedicated EV for Australia, built through the Changan-Mazda joint venture in China. Rear-wheel drive, 78 kWh LFP battery, and a quick 15-min DC fast charge (10-80%) on 200 kW chargers.
- From
- $49,990
- Range
- 560 km
- Battery
- 78 kWh
Key differences at a glance
The biggest material gaps between the Polestar 2 and Mazda 6e, ranked by how much they're likely to matter day-to-day.
- 1
Range · advantage Polestar 2
The Polestar 2 goes 95 km further on a charge (655 vs 560 km WLTP).
- 2
Price · advantage Mazda 6e
The Mazda 6e undercuts the Polestar 2 by $12,410 (20%) on starting price.
- 3
Boot · advantage Polestar 2
The Polestar 2 swallows 68 L more cargo with the rear seats up (405 vs 337 L).
- 4
0–100 km/h · advantage Polestar 2
The Polestar 2 is 1.6 s quicker to 100 km/h (6.2 s vs 7.8 s).
Spec for spec
Highlighted cells show the better number in each row.
Where the Polestar 2 wins
- ▸ 95 km longer WLTP range
- ▸ Quicker 0–100 km/h (6.2s vs 7.8s)
- ▸ Faster DC charging peak (205 kW vs 200 kW)
Where the Mazda 6e wins
- ▸ Cheaper by $12,410
Polestar 2
What we like
- ✓ Class-leading 655 km long-range option
- ✓ Google-built infotainment with native Android Automotive
- ✓ Tasteful, properly minimalist cabin
What we don't
- ✕ Smaller boot than rivals
- ✕ Rear seat space tight for the price
- ✕ Service network limited outside cities
Mazda 6e
What we like
- ✓ Strong 560 km WLTP range
- ✓ Quick 15-min DC fast charge
- ✓ Mazda's well-developed AU dealer network
What we don't
- ✕ Not yet ANCAP tested
- ✕ China-built may be an issue for traditional Mazda buyers
- ✕ Modest 337 L boot
Frequently asked: Polestar 2 vs Mazda 6e
Quick answers to the questions cross-shoppers most often ask about this pair.
- Which is cheaper, the Polestar 2 or the Mazda 6e?
- The Mazda 6e is the cheaper of the two — it starts at $49,990 versus $62,400 for the Polestar 2, a $12,410 difference. Prices shown are manufacturer recommended retail excluding on-road costs.
- Which has the longer driving range?
- The Polestar 2 has the longer WLTP-claimed range at 655 km, 95 km further than the Mazda 6e's 560 km. Real-world range typically lands 10–20% below the WLTP figure depending on speed, terrain, climate and load.
- Which one charges faster on a DC fast charger?
- The Polestar 2 accepts a peak DC charging rate of 205 kW versus 200 kW for the Mazda 6e. Peak rate only holds for a short window during the charging curve, so real-world 10–80% times often diverge less than the peak numbers suggest. Compatibility with 350 kW chargers depends on the vehicle's onboard architecture, not just the published peak.
- Which is quicker off the line?
- The Polestar 2 does 0–100 km/h in 6.2 seconds — 1.6 s quicker than the Mazda 6e's 7.8 s. EV acceleration figures hold up at speed better than equivalent petrol cars because electric motors deliver peak torque instantly.
- Is the Mazda 6e better value than the Polestar 2?
- On paper the Mazda 6e is $12,410 cheaper, but trails the Polestar 2 on the core measurable specs. The saving might still be worth it if you don't need the extra range, power or charging speed — but the Polestar 2 is the spec-sheet winner.
Which one should you buy?
The short version, based on where each car pulls ahead.
Choose the
Polestar 2
if…
- ✓ maximum range matters (95 km further per charge)
- ✓ you want quicker acceleration off the line
- ✓ you match the profile: design-conscious commuters
Choose the
Mazda 6e
if…
- ✓ you want to save $12,410 on the sticker
- ✓ you match the profile: mazda loyalists
Verdict reasoning is derived from published specs; brand preference, dealer experience and how a car drives are personal — always take a test drive before deciding.