Head-to-head
Smart #1 vs Skoda Enyaq
Just $90 separates the Smart #1 and Skoda Enyaq on starting price, but the Skoda Enyaq goes 140 km further on a charge. Here's where the rest of the spec sheets pull apart.
Option A · SUV
Smart #1
Smart returned to Australia under Geely ownership — the #1 is a small electric SUV (despite the city-car Smart heritage). Built in Geely's Xi'an factory in China.
- From
- $54,900
- Range
- 420 km
- Battery
- 66 kWh
Option B · SUV
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda's mid-size electric SUV — the more practical sibling of the VW ID.5 and Audi Q4 e-tron. 585 L boot is class-leading; the RS dual-motor variant adds 250 kW for more performance.
- From
- $54,990
- Range
- 560 km
- Battery
- 82 kWh
Key differences at a glance
The biggest material gaps between the Smart #1 and Skoda Enyaq, ranked by how much they're likely to matter day-to-day.
- 1
Range · advantage Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq goes 140 km further on a charge (560 vs 420 km WLTP).
- 2
Battery · advantage Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq carries a 16.0 kWh larger battery (82 vs 66 kWh).
- 3
Boot · advantage Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq swallows 185 L more cargo with the rear seats up (585 vs 400 L).
- 4
DC charging · advantage Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq accepts 35 kW more DC peak charging (185 vs 150 kW), meaning shorter road-trip stops.
- 5
Warranty · advantage Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq covers the vehicle for 2 more years (7 vs 5 yrs).
Spec for spec
Highlighted cells show the better number in each row.
Where the Smart #1 wins
- ▸ Cheaper by $90
Where the Skoda Enyaq wins
- ▸ 140 km longer WLTP range
- ▸ Quicker 0–100 km/h (6.5s vs 6.7s)
- ▸ Faster DC charging peak (185 kW vs 150 kW)
- ▸ Longer warranty (7 years)
Smart #1
What we like
- ✓ Distinctive Smart-branded design
- ✓ Strong performance from the Pro+ RWD variant
- ✓ 150 kW DC charging keeps it road-trip viable
What we don't
- ✕ Smart dealer network is brand-new in Australia
- ✕ ANCAP not yet rated locally
- ✕ China origin (under Geely, not Daimler)
Skoda Enyaq
What we like
- ✓ Class-leading 585 L boot
- ✓ 7-year Skoda warranty
- ✓ 185 kW DC charging keeps it road-trip viable
What we don't
- ✕ VW Group infotainment quirks
- ✕ Pricing creeps up quickly for higher trims
- ✕ Skoda's Australian dealer network limited regionally
Frequently asked: Smart #1 vs Skoda Enyaq
Quick answers to the questions cross-shoppers most often ask about this pair.
- Which is cheaper, the Smart #1 or the Skoda Enyaq?
- The Smart #1 is the cheaper of the two — it starts at $54,900 versus $54,990 for the Skoda Enyaq, a $90 difference. Prices shown are manufacturer recommended retail excluding on-road costs.
- Which has the longer driving range?
- The Skoda Enyaq has the longer WLTP-claimed range at 560 km, 140 km further than the Smart #1's 420 km. Real-world range typically lands 10–20% below the WLTP figure depending on speed, terrain, climate and load.
- Which one charges faster on a DC fast charger?
- The Skoda Enyaq accepts a peak DC charging rate of 185 kW versus 150 kW for the Smart #1. Peak rate only holds for a short window during the charging curve, so real-world 10–80% times often diverge less than the peak numbers suggest. Compatibility with 350 kW chargers depends on the vehicle's onboard architecture, not just the published peak.
- Which has the longer warranty?
- The Skoda Enyaq is covered by a 7-year vehicle warranty, versus 5 years for the Smart #1. Both also carry separate high-voltage battery warranties — check the manufacturer's site for the latest kilometre and condition limits.
Which one should you buy?
The short version, based on where each car pulls ahead.
Choose the
Skoda Enyaq
if…
- ✓ maximum range matters (140 km further per charge)
- ✓ you regularly load it up (185 L more boot)
- ✓ peace-of-mind warranty matters (2 more years of cover)
Verdict reasoning is derived from published specs; brand preference, dealer experience and how a car drives are personal — always take a test drive before deciding.